Sunshine in May
Walk-Off, Cubed
I'm going to start with last week's post. Because I'm so rarely right... I flipped the game on last Tuesday when I got home, rolled my eyes, and went back downstairs to eat dinner with the missus and the baby boy. The missus had whipped up some chili; the last of the year, said she, as the rainy, cold days of the spring were due to break any day. Throw in some crusty brick-oven bread from Paneantico on Third Avenue and you've got yourself a fine Tuesday night dinner. I was in no hurry to get back to the game. As I detailed last week, I was pretty sure I knew how it was going to go. And that's how it went. Maddeningly. I was pretty confident Burnett was going to pitch well. He's been pitching well all year. The only hiccup has been that one game at Fenway when he couldn't stop the usual ping-pong game at the original launching pad, Fenway Park. And the Yankees don't handle the good pitchers the way they should, so they were going to be toast. So sometimes I know what I'm talking about. Or I just got lucky...
This was a mighty fine stretch of exciting finishing for Yankee fans, I must say. The last few years it seemed we were on the losing end of these things far more than the reverse. So I'll take what transpired this last weekend with the Twins, whose last few seasons at Yankee Stadium have been the baseball version of Jennifer Aniston's love life. Plucky, interesting, but ultimately sad. For them. Not for me. Walking-off is no way to go through the season, of course, because the fact that you can't close the deal and need to keep relying on your last at-bat tells you that you've got things that need to be fixed. Friday night was highway robbery. A two-run deficit against Joe Nathan in the ninth inning, and then a run down with two outs, well, what can you say. That was funkadelic. Saturday's game should have been closed out before any extra-inning nonsense ever happened. Joba put you in the driver's seat, and Phil Coke and Edwar Ramirez puked it right up. You need to close that out. And today's game was a great come-from-behind win, and the Yankees did a lot of things right, but the Ferocious Lion swung at ball four and ball five with the bases loaded in the eighth inning, taking a run and a lead off the board with two ill-advised swings. And that crazy play in the ninth should have put Robbie Cano in the batter's box with one out and the fastest man in America on third. In fact, I was scratching my head when, after Swisher walked and Gardner went in to pinch run, Melky bunted him over to third. Why are you bunting there? Just steal the base. You've got a better-than-average chance he makes it, so why don't you just give it a whirl. You left it up to Ramiro Pena/Francisco Cervelli with a runner on second and one out? Didn't love that play. Point is, the Yankees should have won that game before the dramatic Johnny Delicious swing.
There were actually three defining plays in today's game for me. Obviously one was the walk-off bomb. The second was the crazy play in the ninth. So let's go back to that crazy play for a second. Was Gardner too aggressive? Yes. Do I have a big problem with it? No. I want the other team back on their heels. I want them nervous that he's going to do something off-the-wall like that. Fielders who are concerned about stuff like that will often rush things and find themselves butter-balling things. I'll take it. The hero of that play, obviously, was Joe Mauer. It might have been the best play I've ever seen a catcher make. The reason wasn't so much the athleticism (world-class) but the thought. There was an out to be had at first. He would have gotten Cervelli, and it would have been the second out, seemingly exactly what you would have wanted. Watching the play live, I was surprised he didn't throw it. After having a minute to drink the whole thing in, you realize why. If he had thrown it, they never would have gotten Gardner coming around third. Never. And Gardner expected him to throw it, which is why he never broke stride. Clever. Mauer pump-faked it. More clever. Then he turned and won the foot race back to the plate. Brilliant. Other-worldly. The other pivotal play was the Ferocious Lion tagging from third on Melky's pop-up to tie the game in the seventh. That was a therapeutic moment for me, if I can be unnecessarily dramatic for a second. I can't say it long enough or loud enough. You have to go there. Make them make a play. If you play it safe and don't tag up in that spot, you're again relying on Ramiro Pena with two outs, and only a base hit gets it done. This was an opportunity to force the issue. The only thing the runner has to do in this case is not leave early and run as fast as he can. The fielder has to catch it cleanly, transfer it cleanly to the throwing hand, make a strong throw that will beat the runner, throw it accurately enough to beat the runner, the catcher has to catch it cleanly and apply the tag cleanly and quickly enough to beat the runner. Granted, if all of those things had happened the Ferocious Lion was a dead duck. The ball wasn't that deep. But when you look at what had to go right for the defenders, it was check, check, check, whoops. Run scores. This is how Mike Scoscia has been eating the Yankees' lunch for what seems like a century. Kudos to Rob Thomson the third base coach. I love the work he's doing down there. That was the game, if you ask me. That run doesn't score, and I'm probably still huddled in a corner shivering and muttering to myself about the Ferocious Lion swinging at balls four and five in the eighth.
The New York media has decided that Allie's return is the reason Tex has busted out. Maybe, maybe not. I tend to think that a guy whose average is hovering 100 points below his career number is going to turn it around at some point. Might as well be now. It is getting towards late May... And although Allie clearly doesn't have his timing all the way back, you can't argue the difference he makes in a game. Big-moment bombs on Saturday and Sunday. Plain and simple, you didn't have anybody to hit those bombs for the first six weeks of the season. Is Allie the reason they're 6-2 since he's come back? Who knows. But he hasn't hurt things...
I hope they ride this wave a while. It's nice to be back within striking distance. And three days of walk-off wins is not a bad way to spend a weekend...
Mother of Mercy
Rainy Sunday
Awesome Guys. Awesome.
Back in the Bronx
Banner Start
Looking In from the Outside
Thursday night, New York City. October is quickly tumbling towards November, and the weather is following along, obediently. The missus is out with her crew in Staten Island. The baby boy is at his grandparents' house. That leaves me in the blue room, trying to pack my thoughts on the 2008 season into something coherent. I have game 2 on in the other room, but as always, I couldn't care less. If the Yankees aren't playing, I'm not really interested.
So let's begin where we left off. The Red Sox ran out of pixie dust. As I watched game 6 with Big Joe, the Red Sox still peacocking all of their magic down in Tampa, I relayed to him something Acc told me years ago, when the Yanks were in the middle of all of their glory. "Someday," he said, "This is going to end. It can't go on forever." And further to that, I said to Big Joe, when it ends, it tends to come crashing down. I can't say it crashed down as badly for the Red Sox as it did for the Yankees in 2001, but hey - the bigger you are, the harder you fall. I'll repeat what I said last week. As a dynasty, the Red Sox were always going to be a fraud. That's not what they were, for a thousand reasons. But man, they knew how to dig in their heels.
So a few thoughts on the new Stadium. My opinion hasn't changed from when they first announced this whole thing. Do they need it? No. Do I have an issue with them putting up a new Stadium? No. Does it thrill me? No. Does it kill me that they're moving the field where Babe Ruth, Lou Gehrig, Joe DiMaggio, Mickey Mantle, Reggie Jackson, Don Mattingly, and Bernie Williams played? It crushes me. That totally devastates me. Why would you do that? The field is the thing. Not the building. It's the field. I hate that they're moving the field. My thought is, if you're going to move the field, then you might as well pack the whole thing up and move it to Manhattan. The building is the building, and the Bronx is the Bronx, but the field is the key. So I get that things change, and I'm not against putting up a new building with an opportunity to make millions upon millions more. Honestly, I'm okay with that. But back in '74, you realized it was better to find temporary accommodations than to lose the one thing that matters. The field. That's the one thing that bothers me. That they didn't want to take a bit of a financial step backward for 2 years (if that?!) to keep the one thing that has always made Yankee Stadium Yankee Stadium. The field.
I promised Big Joe and his buddy Charlie that I would do a bit on the Mets, so here goes. The Mets. Man. What can you say. Two years of devastating meltdowns. I was listening to some of the banter on talk radio in the days following, and I was a bit confused by what I heard. Met fans, specifically and particularly the talking head radio and TV personalities, seemed to be coming out in favor of keeping Jerry Manuel on as Mets manager. So let me get this straight. There was one constant in the coaching ranks for two of the most colossal collapses in baseball history. Jerry Manuel. It was cool to blame Willie for a while, and it still is, but who was his bench coach? If you're going to argue that Manuel didn't have any accountability for '07 just because he was bench coach, then why do you have a bench coach? If he's useless and not accountable, why are you paying him in the first place? I was listening to Joe Benigno (who I love) and Evan Roberts (can go either way) on WFAN as I was driving around on Columbus Day, and anytime a caller would suggest the Mets should get a new manager, they would immediately jump down his throat. "Who?!" they would bark at him. One guy suggested Buck Showalter. "What has he ever won?!" they screamed. But here's where that falls down. You're not going to get a new manager because there isn't anyone available who has a history of winning consistently? That's completely idiotic. How many of those are there? Four? If that? What did Joe Torre win before he got to the Bronx? What did Terry Francona win before he got to Boston? What had Scoscia won before he started with Anaheim? Or Joe Maddon? Find someone you believe in and take a shot. That's what winning teams do. Jerry Manuel needs to go, and the Mets need to start fresh. I think they have the right core of players. They need more depth at pitching and they need more consistency from their bats. They shouldn't, because they have lots of marquee names in that lineup, but they do. David Wright is getting killed in New York for failing to come up clutch. They're calling him D-Rod. Yikes. But for my money, the guy who needs to go is Jose Reyes. Jose Reyes is bad for a baseball team. I always marvel that Mets fans trip over themselves making excuses for him. He acts like a total *ss, and the fans turn a blind eye. The day before the Mets collapsed again, when Johan Santana came out and threw a gem, there was Jose Reyes, running out to do his ridiculous dancing out on the field when somebody hits a home run. Dude, everybody else in the league knows to keep it in the dugout. Especially when your season is hanging on by a thread. What is your problem? And for the second year in a row, he's disappeared down the stretch. I know he's a scary player with a ton of weapons, but guys who carry that kind of bad karma generally don't win. (See: Bonds, Rodriguez...okay, Manny is clearly an exception). The good news is that the collapse, in a strange way, doesn't seem as monumental after you watch the Phillies do what they've done. It was tougher to swallow last year when the Phillies mugged the Mets and then got swept in the first round.
So let's get to an annual favorite: the smartest and dumbest things I said this year. As usual, the dumb thing was way dumber than the smart thing was clever. And believe it or not, my insistence that the Rays weren't for real wasn't the dumbest thing (although it was plenty dumb, obviously). The dumbest thing I said this year was this, on April 3rd:
"The fact is the Yankees are playing in their second game of the season and the best they have to throw out there is Mike Mussina. I know there are a lot of guys out there who love the Moose, and have for years. People get on me immediately when we kill him in the BPS. But guys - he is a number five starter. Number five. Is there anybody out there who thinks Moose has a better chance to throw a killer game than Phil Hughes? Somebody explain that to me.... Or Ian Kennedy, for that matter.... "
Yup. That's me, with the razor-sharp insight that Moose was a dumber choice to start a game in 2008 than Ian Kennedy. Further proof that I haven't the slightest idea what I'm talking about. I owe Sean a beer just on principle.
On to the smartest thing, posted on April 15:
"You've seen [Francona] many times over the last few years take risks in order to "write the story." Dice K is a great example. At least three times last year against the Yankees, and this year's game makes four, Francona stayed far too long with an ineffective and mightily struggling Dice K to try and get him a win."
This wasn't the first time I've talked about this. The implication, of course, is that one day this was coming to come back and bite Francona. And bite him it did. Only it wasn't Dice K. It was Beckett. If he yanks him when he should have yanked him in game 2, the Sox probably win that game and take 2-0 back to Boston. And in one of the few times I've ever felt Francona was being disingenuous, he said after the game, "I felt he was the right guy for that spot." I'm not Terry Francona, but his track record betrays him here. He was trying to get him a win. Period. And he got burned.
Last thing. My heart sank when I read yesterday that Mike Cameron was "high on the Yankees priority list." As I said to Acc today on the phone, if that's true, the Yankees are already out of contention for 2009. Not that Cameron himself is the reason (although he would be an awful, awful pick-up), but it would be clear that the Yankees are headed in the wrong direction. I think Mike F had a great tidbit in his comment the other day about Girardi saying that the Yankees "needed to swing early" against the better pitchers. Big Joe confirmed that he heard it also. If that's his attitude, fire him right now. I'm not kidding. That's exactly what you don't do. What you can't do. And that's just it. Mike Cameron isn't the type of player that is going to help you. I have to say, I'm really having trouble with that one. Who exactly in the Yankees front-office was the guy saying, "Cameron might be available?! Get him!!" What sense does that make? He's hit .242 the last two years with low 20's in home runs and a million - a million - strikeouts. He is exactly what was wrong with the Yankees last year. If that's the type of guy they're going to go after, and the type of team they're going to be, they've already lost. I will note, though, that the Yankees did not confirm the report.
Maybe I'll stop back in after the World Series. I hope this isn't going to be a long off-season....
Beyond Explanation
At the end of my last post, I said I had a number of things to go through when I checked back in. And I still do. But I'm not going to talk about any of them. It's Thursday night/Friday morning, I have to talk about what I just saw. I guess they would have to close it out for this to be perfected, but however it ends, we are watching one of the most incredible teams of all time, in any sport. When the Red Sox won the World Series last year, there were whispers of the "D" word. Dynasty. Two Championships in four years really doesn't get you there, though, so they were just that. Whispers. They got louder after the first round of the playoffs, and reached a crescendo (so far) after the Red Sox game one win in Tampa.
With that as background, this is probably the right time to point out that there are three people you generally can't afford full credibility to when they are opining on the Yankees, Red Sox, or Mets, and that's Yankees fans, Red Sox fans, and Met fans. All of them have a stake in all of the others' situations. Met fans and Red Sox fans ( in general - doesn't apply to every case, of course) might tell you that they're agnostic on the fortunes of the other, but scratch the surface, and they will all probably admit that they like to see the other succeed just because it might p*ss off Yankee fans. My point is, I'm a Yankee fan, so feel free to stop reading here if you feel my allegiance will "Lupica" my credibility in this debate.
As a "dynasty," the Red Sox were always going to be a fraud. You can argue that it all hinges on what your definition of dynasty is, and you can certainly throw a number at it and say that, say, three, championships in five years or so constitutes a dynasty. Tough to argue. For me, a dynasty is a team that goes out and beats you because they're the best team every day, every year. The Red Sox have not been that. And I understand that Red Sox fans would want to use the word. It's a big word; there aren't too many opportunities to use it in sports. It's a marquee term. But frankly, to use that term with this Red Sox team would be missing the point of this team. What they aren't is the team that goes out and beats you day in and day out. In thirteen years, this team has won its division exactly once. One time. And if not for a four-run April comeback in the ninth inning against Mo Rivera, they don't even finish first that one time. They always say that the season is a marathon, not a sprint. And in this marathon, Boston has just once in thirteen years been able to beat out just four other teams to win their division. Fifty years ago, they never would have made the playoffs.
So what are they. Well, they are simply the most brilliantly, fantastically, spectacularly resilient team I have ever seen in professional sports. I can't think of a close second, or even a distance second. They own it, entirely. Let's start from the beginning. In 2003, the year they came of age, the Yankees had run away with the division and the Sox were fighting for a Wild Card. And as the season wore on, I remember laughing with a couple of the boys that the Red Sox just seemed to be able to yank a game out of their butt whenever they absolutely needed it. You could almost predict it. You could look at the standings and the games that were in progress on any given night, and if the Red Sox were going to take a significant ding with a loss, you would see them start some crazy three-run rally in the bottom of the ninth. It was automatic. I always used to say they had a pocketful of miracles. So they ride their miracles into the playoffs, and they find themselves down 0-2 to the A's and in extra innings. Eric Byrnes should have crossed the plate with the winning run, but the umps ruled (correctly) that he never touched the plate and was called out as Varitek chased him halfway to the dugout to apply the tag. The Red Sox survived and eventually won the game, then followed it with two wins to take the series. Then they face the Yankees, who took a 3-2 lead back to Yankee Stadium. With a Yankee lead in the 8th inning in game six, they got a routine fly ball that got caught in the wind by Nomar, and then a go-ahead shot that sparked a multi-run inning to steal game six. Game seven in 2003 was the one and only time in this decade that their luck abandoned them. Fast forward to 2004. Goes without saying. Then '05 and '06 were a bust. Then '07. Down 3-1 to the Indians, they pulled off the ALCS win. So at that point they had pulled off, in their two Championships, the greatest and the second greatest series comebacks in the history of baseball. Now 2008. Again down 3-1, but this time losing 7-0 with two outs and a man on in the seventh inning. Guys, say what you want. I know '04 was a 3-0 deficit, and I know it was against the Yankees. For a Red Sox fan, I can understand if that was their favorite. But if they pull this off in '08, and I would not be the slightest bit surprised if they do, this beats them all. Down 3 games to 1, and losing by seven runs in the seventh inning with two outs, having to not just win, but go back on the road and win two more. I have not seen a more unbelievable feat in my entire lifetime by one team, in any sport. That would absolutely beat them all. And then you would be looking at a team that came back from 3-0, 3-1, and 3-1 down 7 runs with 7 outs to go, resulting in 3 Championships. There is no precedent for that anywhere in professional sports, as far as I know. And I challenge anybody to find me something even close. I know you might think I'm getting ahead of myself here, but am I? Is Tampa really going to snap back from this? Particularly since Big HGH and JD Drew seem to have survived their slumps and gotten their strokes back? Really? I don't see it. And I certainly don't have any faith in the National League. Now I'll admit, I've been dogging the Rays all year. I openly admit it. But for the last few days I've been telling everybody - Let's just see them close it out. Let's see if they really are immune to the Red Sox magic. And wow. Wow, wow, wow.
So why not a dynasty? Because that's not them. This win tonight made them 12-2 in their last 14 playoff elimination games. Just drink that in for a minute. Fourteen elimination games, and they've won twelve. Astounding. And to get it done this year it would be fourteen out of sixteen (at least), including their last ten in a row. So what was the Yankees record in elimination games in their run from 1996-2000? One and one. And that's the point. They just didn't find themselves in elimination games. They pretty much just buzz-sawed through everybody. If you're asking me, that's a dynasty. But that doesn't take away from what the Red Sox are. Frankly, there have been lots of dynasties in sports. I don't know if you'll ever see another team like this crazy Red Sox team. They are almost beyond explanation.
I know, I know. I'm already giving them 6 wins in their next nine games. Getting ahead of myself. Fine. Is anybody out there betting against them?
